<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quantity over quality: weak thinking and disgusting coffee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usableinterfaces.com/2007/05/24/quantity-over-quality-weak-thinking-and-disgusting-coffee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usableinterfaces.com/2007/05/24/quantity-over-quality-weak-thinking-and-disgusting-coffee/</link>
	<description>Observations on UE, strategy, digital trends and all that</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:23:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://usableinterfaces.com/2007/05/24/quantity-over-quality-weak-thinking-and-disgusting-coffee/#comment-3624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usin.wordpress.com/2007/05/24/quantity-over-quality-weak-thinking-and-disgusting-coffee/#comment-3624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well it&#039;s some strong feelings you got there and I&#039;m afraid to say i&#039;ve mostly agreed with you. Coffee to go is very rarely anything but rubbish but after my few years of filtering this and that I&#039;ve had to realise that there are a good few coffees that will not offer their treasures any other way but the way of steam. The downside of the espresso method, however perfect as a good one can taste, is the comparative lack of variety it&#039;s possible to achieve. You&#039;re right. It could have been Koffee, Cafe, K&#039;feeee, but it ends up just plain espresso.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#8217;s some strong feelings you got there and I&#8217;m afraid to say i&#8217;ve mostly agreed with you. Coffee to go is very rarely anything but rubbish but after my few years of filtering this and that I&#8217;ve had to realise that there are a good few coffees that will not offer their treasures any other way but the way of steam. The downside of the espresso method, however perfect as a good one can taste, is the comparative lack of variety it&#8217;s possible to achieve. You&#8217;re right. It could have been Koffee, Cafe, K&#8217;feeee, but it ends up just plain espresso.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James PP</title>
		<link>http://usableinterfaces.com/2007/05/24/quantity-over-quality-weak-thinking-and-disgusting-coffee/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James PP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 13:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usin.wordpress.com/2007/05/24/quantity-over-quality-weak-thinking-and-disgusting-coffee/#comment-931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I say bring back Filter Coffee. I have experienced the same AMERICANO=FILTER COFFEE (NO) frustration.  In fact, one of the only places left to get something resembling 70s Filter coffee is MacDonalds (but the main counter not the MacCafe).

Personally, I think Gold Blend with a splash of UHT milk is hard to beat...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say bring back Filter Coffee. I have experienced the same AMERICANO=FILTER COFFEE (NO) frustration.  In fact, one of the only places left to get something resembling 70s Filter coffee is MacDonalds (but the main counter not the MacCafe).</p>
<p>Personally, I think Gold Blend with a splash of UHT milk is hard to beat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

